According to theories of nature appreciation, which perspective values nature for its own sake?

The perspective that values nature for its own sake is related to ecocentrism. This viewpoint recognizes the intrinsic value of all living organisms and their natural environment, asserting that nature deserves respect and ethical consideration independent of its utility to humans. Ecocentrism emphasizes the interconnectedness of ecosystems and the importance of biodiversity, advocating for a holistic approach to environmental ethics that sees natural entities as deserving moral standing.

In contrast, egocentrism focuses on self-interest, viewing nature primarily in terms of its benefits to individual organisms. Anthropocentrism centers around human interests and often evaluates nature based on its utility for human needs and comforts. Logocentrism, while less commonly referenced in discussions about nature appreciation, pertains more to the interpretation of language and culture rather than a perspective on nature itself. Thus, ecocentrism distinctly stands out as valuing nature for its own sake, focusing on its inherent worth rather than merely its usefulness to humans.